Laura v. Laura

89 A.D.2d 544, 452 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17590
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 22, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 89 A.D.2d 544 (Laura v. Laura) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laura v. Laura, 89 A.D.2d 544, 452 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17590 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Chananau, J.), entered July 24,1981, modifying a judgment of the same court, entered June 26,1978, pursuant to an order of this court, entered July 17, 1980 (77 AD2d 523), unanimously reversed to the extent appealed from, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and plaintiff’s motion to resettle the aforesaid judgment granted to the extent of awarding interest on the award of arrears from June 1, 1978. On the appeal from the judgment of divorce we modified (p 523) “to amend the judgment to grant to plaintiff-appellant judgment for arrears in payments” under prior orders providing for temporary alimony and child support. After Special Term referred the issue of the amount of arrears due to a referee, the parties eventually agreed that $6,470 was due. Their stipulation did not provide for interest. In her proposed resettled judgment plaintiff sought interest from June 1, 1978, the date of the judgment of divorce. In confirming the referee’s report and directing judgment for $6,470 in arrears Special Term refused to award interest. This was error. Section 244 of the Domestic Relations Law provides for interest on “any arrears if the default was willful, in that the obligated spouse knowingly, consciously and voluntarily disregarded the obligation under a lawful court order * * * from the date on which the payment was due”. Defendant offered no explanation for his failure to pay alimony and child support as ordered. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Markewich, Fein and Milonas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wolfson v. Public Administrator of Nassau County
282 A.D.2d 743 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Perri v. Perri
265 A.D.2d 539 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 A.D.2d 544, 452 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laura-v-laura-nyappdiv-1982.