Laura Pressley v. Gregorio "Greg" Casar

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 22, 2015·No. 03-15-00368-CV·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 03-15-00368-CV 7042155 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/22/2015 3:51:15 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK No. 03-15-00368-CV

IN THE FILED IN THIRD COURT OF APPEALS 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/22/2015 3:51:15 PM _____________________________________ JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk L AURA P RESSLEY, Appellant, v.

GREGORIO “GREG” C ASAR , Appellee. _____________________________________

No. 03-15-00505-CV

IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS _____________________________________

DAVID R OGERS, Appellant, v.

GREGORIO “GREG” C ASAR , Appellee. _____________________________________

APPELLEE’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE AND RESET BRIEFING DEADLINES _____________________________________ TO THE HONORABLE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS: Appellee Gregorio “Greg” Casar files this Unopposed Motion to Consolidate

and Reset the Briefing Deadlines in this consolidated appeal. Appellee requests the

Court to make Appellee’s deadline for filing its brief in No. 03-15-00368-CV run from the filing of Appellant Roger’s filing of his brief in No. 03-15-00505-CV. Both

Appellants are appealing from the same judgment, from the same trial court case,

using the same record, and raising many of the exact same issues. This motion seeks

to allow orderly briefing in this case, and prevent unnecessary waste of resources.

Both of these appeals arise from the same underlying case, Pressley v. Casar, No.

D-1-GN-15-000374, in the 201st District Court, Travis County, Texas. Appellant

Laura Pressley filed her notice of appeal first, and Appellant David Rogers later filed

his own notice of appeal. The Clerk originally docketed these cases as separate

appeals (No. 03-15-00368-CV and No. 03-15-00505-CV), but the Court subsequently

consolidated the appeals.

Because the case was originally docketed as separate appeals, the deadlines for

briefing in No. 03-15-00368-CV began to run before the briefing deadlines in No. 03-

15-00505-CV. As a result, on September 16, 2015, Appellant Laura Pressley filed her

Appellant’s Brief in No. 03-15-00368-CV, and Appellee’s Brief is currently due on

October 6, 2015. However, in No. 03-15-00505-CV, Appellant David Rogers’ brief is

due on October 7, 2015, one day after Appellee’s current brief deadline in No. 03-15-

00368-CV.

As noted above, these appeals arise from the same underlying judgment and

many of the factual and legal issues are identical. Appellee anticipates that the

necessary briefing will be identical, and hopes to address them, if possible, in one

consolidated brief. Under the current briefing schedule, Appellee would be required

2 to file his initial brief before one of the appellants, and would be forced to brief the

case twice. Forcing Appellee to file redundant briefs will waste time and resources

and confuse the briefing in this consolidated appeal.

For these reasons, Appellee files this unopposed motion and asks the Court to

consolidate and reset the briefing deadlines in these consolidated appeals, making

Appellee’s deadline for filing his brief in No. 03-15-00368-CV run from the filing of

Appellant Roger’s filing of his brief in No. 03-15-00505-CV.

This motion is not made for the purpose of delay, and neither the Court nor

the Parties will be prejudiced by the granting of the relief requested. Instead, the

granting of this motion will prevent unnecessary waste of the Court and the Parties’

resources, and allow for a better presentation of the merits of the issues involved.

The undersigned counsel conferred with Appellant’s Counsel in No. 03-15-00368-CV,

and was informed that he did not oppose the granting of this motion.

PRAYER Accordingly, Appellee requests the Court to consolidate and reset the briefing

schedule, making Appellee’s deadline for filing its brief in No. 03-15-00368-CV run

from the filing of Appellant Roger’s filing of his brief in No. 03-15-00505-CV.

3 Dated: September 22, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

By: Charles Herring, Jr. /s/ Kurt Kuhn State Bar No. 09534100 Kurt Kuhn chuck@herringpanzer.com State Bar No. 24002433 Lauren Ross kurt@kuhnhobbs.com State Bar No. 24092001 Lisa Bowlin Hobbs laurenbross@herring-irwin.com State Bar No. 24026905 HERRING & PANZER, L.L.P. lisa@kuhnhobbs.com 1411 West Avenue, Suite 100 KUHN HOBBS PLLC Austin, Texas 78701 3307 Northland Drive, Suite 310 (512) 320-0665 Austin, Texas 78731-4946 (512) 519-7580 (fax) (512) 476-6005 (512) 476-6002 (fax)

Jessica Palvino State Bar No. 24048780 jpalvino@mcginnislaw.com MCGINNIS, LOCHRIDGE & KILGORE, LLP 600 Congress Avenue, Suite 2100 Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 495-6079 (512) 505-6379 (fax)

COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE

4 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I hereby certify, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.1(a)(5), that I conferred with Mark Cohen, counsel for Appellant Laura Pressley, whom indicated that he does not oppose the relief sought in this motion.

/s/ Kurt Kuhn Kurt Kuhn

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I served a copy of this notice on counsel of record either electronically, in accordance with the rules on electronic filing on September 22, 2015, as listed below:

Mark Cohen 805 West 10th Street, Suite 100 Austin, Texas 78701 mark@cohenlegalservices.com

David Rogers LAW OFFICE OF DAVID ROGERS 1201 Spyglass Drive, Suite 100 Austin, Texas 78746 firm@darogerslaw.com

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Laura Pressley v. Gregorio "Greg" Casar, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Laura Pressley v. Gregorio "Greg" Casar (Laura Pressley v. Gregorio "Greg" Casar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.