Laura O'Sullivan v. Jason Hagan

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 17, 2025
Docket25-1212
StatusUnpublished

This text of Laura O'Sullivan v. Jason Hagan (Laura O'Sullivan v. Jason Hagan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laura O'Sullivan v. Jason Hagan, (4th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1212 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/17/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-1212

LAURA H.G. O’SULLIVAN; CHASITY BROWN; RACHEL KIEFER; MICHAEL T. CANTRELL; JESSICA HORTON, Substitute Trustees,

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

v.

JASON C. HAGAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Julie R. Rubin, District Judge. (1:25-cv-00643-JRR)

Submitted: June 12, 2025 Decided: June 17, 2025

Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jason C. Hagan, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-1212 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/17/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Jason C. Hagan seeks to appeal the district court’s order remanding this case to state

court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) (“If at any time before

final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case

shall be remanded.”). With limited exceptions not applicable here, a district court’s order

remanding a removed case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is not reviewable on

appeal or otherwise. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); see Doe v. Blair, 819 F.3d 64, 66-67 (4th Cir.

2016) (“[A] district court may remand a case sua sponte for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction at any time, and such an order is not reviewable.” (citations omitted)).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doe Ex Rel. Houdersheldt v. Blair
819 F.3d 64 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Laura O'Sullivan v. Jason Hagan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laura-osullivan-v-jason-hagan-ca4-2025.