Laura Hickey v. Irving Independent School District

986 F.2d 916, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 4841, 1993 WL 71076
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Laura Hickey v. Irving Independent School District. Read the opinion of the Court — 976 F.2d 980
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 15, 1993·No. 91-7350·Published

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

IT IS ORDERED that the motion of appellees to recall the Court’s mandate, 976 F.2d 980 (1992), vacate its opinion and uphold the trial court’s judgment dismissing this case is DENIED. We, however, express no opinion on appellees’ contention that appellant failed to exhaust her administrative remedies under 20 U.S.C. § 1400, et seq., the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”). As appellees correctly point out, they were not served with the complaint and were not made parties below.

Accordingly, the district court, on remand, may reconsider its 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) dismissal not only in light of the timeliness of Hickey’s complaint, but also examine whether Hickey exhausted her administrative remedies under IDEA. See 20 U.S.C. § 1415(f).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Laura Hickey v. Irving Independent School District, 986 F.2d 916, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 4841, 1993 WL 71076 (5th Cir. 1993).

986 F.2d 916 (Laura Hickey v. Irving Independent School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Laura Hickey v. Irving Independent School District
976 F.2d 980 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)