Laun v. Pfister

69 Mo. App. 629, 1897 Mo. App. LEXIS 109
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 9, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 69 Mo. App. 629 (Laun v. Pfister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laun v. Pfister, 69 Mo. App. 629, 1897 Mo. App. LEXIS 109 (Mo. Ct. App. 1897).

Opinion

Biggs, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendants by attachment before a justice of the peace. The defendants filed a plea in abatement before the justice and a trial ensued. The issues were found against the'defendants. The cause reached the circuit court on .appeal, where the plea in abatement was again tried with a like result. The defendants have attempted to appeal from the judgment sustaining the attachment. The record shows that an affidavit for an appeal was filed, but it fails to show that an appeal was granted. It also fails to show a final determination of the cause. The defendant in an attachment must appeal, if at all, [632]*632from the whole ease. Session Acts, 1891, page 45. It follows that the cause must be stricken from the docket.

Judge Bond concurs; Judge Bland not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First National Bank v. Kibble
273 S.W. 148 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1925)
Hull v. Beard
80 Mo. App. 200 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1899)
Newman v. York
74 Mo. App. 292 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 Mo. App. 629, 1897 Mo. App. LEXIS 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laun-v-pfister-moctapp-1897.