Lauminick v. Nicholson

126 F. App'x 963
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedMarch 28, 2005
DocketNos. 03-7131, 03-7137, 03-7139, 03-7140, 03-7156, 03-7157
StatusPublished

This text of 126 F. App'x 963 (Lauminick v. Nicholson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lauminick v. Nicholson, 126 F. App'x 963 (Fed. Cir. 2005).

Opinion

ON MOTION

ORDER

MAYER, Circuit Judge.

Upon consideration of the joint motion in each of these cases (Lauminick v. VA, CAVC 01-0166; Smith v. VA, CAVC 01-2139; Thompson v. VA CAVC 00-1152, Bick v. VA, CAVC 01-0570; Moultrie v. VA CAVC 00-2082; and Travis v. VA CAVC 00-2081) to vacate the decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and remand for further proceedings in view of this court’s decision in the lead case of Wilson v. Principi, 391 F.3d 1203 (Fed.Cir.2004),

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The joint motion in each case is granted.

(2) Each side in each case shall bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. Principi
391 F.3d 1203 (Federal Circuit, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 F. App'x 963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lauminick-v-nicholson-cafc-2005.