Lauminick v. Nicholson

Federal Circuit

Lauminick v. Nicholson

126 F. App'x 963

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided March 28, 2005·No. Nos. 03-7131, 03-7137, 03-7139, 03-7140, 03-7156, 03-7157·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION

ORDER

MAYER, Circuit Judge.

Upon consideration of the joint motion in each of these cases (Lauminick v. VA, CAVC 01-0166; Smith v. VA, CAVC 01-2139; Thompson v. VA CAVC 00-1152, Bick v. VA, CAVC 01-0570; Moultrie v. VA CAVC 00-2082; and Travis v. VA CAVC 00-2081) to vacate the decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and remand for further proceedings in view of this court’s decision in the lead case of Wilson v. Principi, 391 F.3d 1203 (Fed.Cir.2004),

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The joint motion in each case is granted.

(2) Each side in each case shall bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION

ORDER

MAYER, Circuit Judge.

Upon consideration of the joint motion in each of these cases (Lauminick v. VA, CAVC 01-0166; Smith v. VA, CAVC 01-2139; Thompson v. VA CAVC 00-1152, Bick v. VA, CAVC 01-0570; Moultrie v. VA CAVC 00-2082; and Travis v. VA CAVC 00-2081) to vacate the decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and remand for further proceedings in view of this court’s decision in the lead case of Wilson v. Principi, 391 F.3d 1203 (Fed.Cir.2004),

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The joint motion in each case is granted.

(2) Each side in each case shall bear its own costs.

Lauminick v. Nicholson, 126 F. App'x 963 (Fed. Cir. 2005).

Pincite

126 F. App'x 963 (Lauminick v. Nicholson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related