Lauman v. Urschel Lime Co.
136 F. 193, 69 C.C.A. 60, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4453
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 18, 1905
DocketNo. 1,359
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 136 F. 193 (Lauman v. Urschel Lime Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lauman v. Urschel Lime Co., 136 F. 193, 69 C.C.A. 60, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4453 (6th Cir. 1905).
Opinion
This case is similar to No. 1,358 (August H. Lauman v. The Urschel White Dime Company, 136 Fed. 190). It charges an infringement of the same patent, and was decided in the same way in the court below, the bill being dismissed. Having held the patent void, the judgment must be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lumber Anti-Stain Co. v. Nester
178 F. 927 (Sixth Circuit, 1910)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
136 F. 193, 69 C.C.A. 60, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lauman-v-urschel-lime-co-ca6-1905.