Lauman v. Urschel Lime Co.

136 F. 193, 69 C.C.A. 60, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4453
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 18, 1905·No. No. 1,359·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is similar to No. 1,358 (August H. Lauman v. The Urschel White Dime Company, 136 Fed. 190). It charges an infringement of the same patent, and was decided in the same way in the court below, the bill being dismissed. Having held the patent void, the judgment must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lauman v. Urschel Lime Co., 136 F. 193, 69 C.C.A. 60, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4453 (6th Cir. 1905).

136 F. 193 (Lauman v. Urschel Lime Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lumber Anti-Stain Co. v. Nester
178 F. 927 (Sixth Circuit, 1910)