Lauler v. Armstrong

Second Circuit

Lauler v. Armstrong

56 F. App'x 67

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedFebruary 27, 2003

DocketNo. 02-7560

StatusPublished

This text of 56 F. App'x 67 (Lauler v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lauler v. Armstrong, 56 F. App'x 67 (2d Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA.

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the United States Courthouse, Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 27th day of February, two thousand and three.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Appellant John Lauler appeals from the judgment of the District Court granting to [68]*68defendants judgment as a matter of law on their motion for summary judgment. Having reviewed all of the Appellant’s claims, and finding in them no merit, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA.

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the United States Courthouse, Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 27th day of February, two thousand and three.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Appellant John Lauler appeals from the judgment of the District Court granting to [68]*68defendants judgment as a matter of law on their motion for summary judgment. Having reviewed all of the Appellant’s claims, and finding in them no merit, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 F. App'x 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lauler-v-armstrong-ca2-2003.