Laughton v. Hampton Roads Shipping Ass'n

Fourth Circuit

Laughton v. Hampton Roads Shipping Ass'n

613 F. App'x 234

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 24, 2015·No. No. 15-1627·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM, opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Antonio L. Laughton appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion to amend his complaint and granting Appel-lee’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Laughton v. Hampton Rds. Shipping Ass’n, No. 2:14-cv00427-RAJ-LRL (E.D.Va. May 11, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the /acts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM, opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Antonio L. Laughton appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion to amend his complaint and granting Appel-lee’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Laughton v. Hampton Rds. Shipping Ass’n, No. 2:14-cv00427-RAJ-LRL (E.D.Va. May 11, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the /acts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Laughton v. Hampton Roads Shipping Ass'n, 613 F. App'x 234 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

613 F. App'x 234 (Laughton v. Hampton Roads Shipping Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.