Laughton v. Hampton Roads Shipping Ass'n
This text of 613 F. App'x 234 (Laughton v. Hampton Roads Shipping Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM, opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Antonio L. Laughton appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion to amend his complaint and granting Appel-lee’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Laughton v. Hampton Rds. Shipping Ass’n, No. 2:14-cv00427-RAJ-LRL (E.D.Va. May 11, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the /acts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
613 F. App'x 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laughton-v-hampton-roads-shipping-assn-ca4-2015.