Laughlin v. Supervisors of Greene Township
This text of 1 Pa. Just. L. Rep. 117 (Laughlin v. Supervisors of Greene Township) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
This suit should have been brought against the Township of Greene and service had upon its supervisors. This defect could be remedied by amendment and if there were nothing else in the specifications of error, the Court would sustain the record.
The record does not show that any witness was sworn. This is fatal to the record. The Justice says, “After hearing the allegations of the parties.” “Allegations” does not imply a previous oath. An allegation is the assertion, declaration or statement of a party of what he can prove.
The Justice should have taken the statements or allegations of the parties under oath, and if he did, his record should so state.
The other specifications are not sustained.
Now, January 28, 1902, the judgment of the Justice is reversed and set aside.
Reported by Lawrence M. Sebring, Esq.,
Beaver, Pa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Pa. Just. L. Rep. 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laughlin-v-supervisors-of-greene-township-pactcomplbeaver-1902.