Laughlin v. State

153 So. 3d 315, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19303, 2014 WL 6612021
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 24, 2014
DocketNo. 1D14-1039
StatusPublished

This text of 153 So. 3d 315 (Laughlin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laughlin v. State, 153 So. 3d 315, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19303, 2014 WL 6612021 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jason Laughlin appeals the denial of his petition for a name change. Because the circuit court offered two independent grounds for the denial and Laughlin challenges only one, he cannot meet his burden to show reversible error. We are constrained to affirm regardless of whether the issue he raises has merit. See STS Telecom, LLC v. Jacobsen, 901 So.2d 980, 980-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

STS Telecom, LLC v. Jacobsen
901 So. 2d 980 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 So. 3d 315, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19303, 2014 WL 6612021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laughlin-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.