Laughlin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Laughlin v. State

153 So. 3d 315, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19303, 2014 WL 6612021

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 24, 2014·No. No. 1D14-1039·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jason Laughlin appeals the denial of his petition for a name change. Because the circuit court offered two independent grounds for the denial and Laughlin challenges only one, he cannot meet his burden to show reversible error. We are constrained to affirm regardless of whether the issue he raises has merit. See STS Telecom, LLC v. Jacobsen, 901 So.2d 980, 980-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jason Laughlin appeals the denial of his petition for a name change. Because the circuit court offered two independent grounds for the denial and Laughlin challenges only one, he cannot meet his burden to show reversible error. We are constrained to affirm regardless of whether the issue he raises has merit. See STS Telecom, LLC v. Jacobsen, 901 So.2d 980, 980-81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Laughlin v. State, 153 So. 3d 315, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19303, 2014 WL 6612021 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

153 So. 3d 315 (Laughlin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related