Laughlin v. Schuyler

1 Neb. 409
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1871·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Lake, J.

This is an appeal from an order confirming a sale of mortgaged premises under a decree of foreclosure.

The sale was not legally made, and there are, at least, two fatal objections to it. 1st. The return of the master does not show that the persons selected by him to appraise the premises, were residents of the county where the lands, were situated, nor is there anything in .the record froms which this fact can be legitimately inferred. 2d. The. return shows that the premises sold consisted of two city' lots. They were appraised and sold together as one piece of property. Each lot or parcel of ground should have1 been appraised and sold separately. The sale should have beeii set aside. For these reasons the order of the District Court confirming the sale is set aside and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Laughlin v. Schuyler, 1 Neb. 409 (Neb. 1871).

1 Neb. 409 (Laughlin v. Schuyler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First National Bank v. Hunt
165 N.W. 139 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1917)
Clark v. Birge
161 N.W. 427 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1917)
Moore v. Neece
108 N.W. 156 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1906)
Kane v. Jonasen
76 N.W. 441 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1898)
Craig v. Stevenson
15 Neb. 362 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1884)
Eaton v. Ryan
5 Neb. 47 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1876)