Laughlin v. Loftin

Supreme Court of Florida

Laughlin v. Loftin

62 So. 2d 745, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1936

DecidedDecember 22, 1952

StatusPublished

This text of 62 So. 2d 745 (Laughlin v. Loftin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Laughlin v. Loftin, 62 So. 2d 745, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1936 (Fla. 1952).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The record and the briefs in this cause have been examined and Mr. Justice THOMAS, Mr. Justice HOBSON, Mr. Justice ROBERTS, Mr. Justice MATHEWS and Mr. Justice DREW are of the view that the judgment should be affirmed. The facts of the case are detailed in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice TERRELL, who with Mr. Chief Justice SEBRING are of the view that the judgment should be reversed. It follows that the judgment appealed from must be and is hereby affirmed.

SEBRING, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, HOBSON, ROBERTS, MATHEWS and DREW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The record and the briefs in this cause have been examined and Mr. Justice THOMAS, Mr. Justice HOBSON, Mr. Justice ROBERTS, Mr. Justice MATHEWS and Mr. Justice DREW are of the view that the judgment should be affirmed. The facts of the case are detailed in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice TERRELL, who with Mr. Chief Justice SEBRING are of the view that the judgment should be reversed. It follows that the judgment appealed from must be and is hereby affirmed.

SEBRING, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, HOBSON, ROBERTS, MATHEWS and DREW, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 So. 2d 745, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laughlin-v-loftin-fla-1952.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack