Laugenour v. Hennagin
59 Cal. 625
Opinion
Upon the facts appearing, the right of the plaintiff to the certificate of purchase for the land in dispute, which forms a part of the five hundred thousand acre grant, is no longer open to controversy. (Wright v. Laugenour, 55 Cal. 280; Laugenour v. Shanklin, 57 id. 70.)
By Section 1925 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the certificate is made primary evidence that the holder is the owner of the land described therein.
We discover no error in the record.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Laugenour v. Hennagin, 59 Cal. 625 (Cal. 1881).
59 Cal. 625 (Laugenour v. Hennagin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hockett v. Alston
58 S.W. 675 (Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory, 1900)
Witcher v. Conklin
24 P. 302 (California Supreme Court, 1890)
Cucamonga Fruit-Land Co. v. Moir
23 P. 359 (California Supreme Court, 1890)
Goodwin v. McCabe
17 P. 705 (California Supreme Court, 1888)