Lauer v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lauer v. Rose

40 A.D.2d 687, 336 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3784

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 10, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 687 (Lauer v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lauer v. Rose, 40 A.D.2d 687, 336 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3784 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by defendant’s former wife to recover upon a separation agreement, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 23, 1970, as is in plaintiff’s favor upon a directed verdict and from so much of an order of the same court dated December 31,1968 as struck out defendant’s first defense and first counterclaim. Judgment and order affirmed insofar as appealed from by defendant, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Plaintiff’s cross appeal from a portion of the above-mentioned judgment is deemed discontinued, without costs, in view of the statement in her brief that she does not intend to pursue her cross appeal. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Gulotta and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by defendant’s former wife to recover upon a separation agreement, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 23, 1970, as is in plaintiff’s favor upon a directed verdict and from so much of an order of the same court dated December 31,1968 as struck out defendant’s first defense and first counterclaim. Judgment and order affirmed insofar as appealed from by defendant, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Plaintiff’s cross appeal from a portion of the above-mentioned judgment is deemed discontinued, without costs, in view of the statement in her brief that she does not intend to pursue her cross appeal. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Gulotta and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 687, 336 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lauer-v-rose-nyappdiv-1972.