Lauer v. Lauer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lauer v. Lauer

833 S.W.2d 893, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1363, 1992 WL 195496

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 18, 1992·No. Nos. 60013, 60044·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Both Esther S. Lauer and Norbert F. Lauer, Jr., appeal from a decree which dissolved their marriage. The decree is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence and neither erroneously declares or applies the law. A written opinion would have no precedential value. The trial court’s decree is, therefore, affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). We have provided the parties with a memorandum, solely for their own use, explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Both Esther S. Lauer and Norbert F. Lauer, Jr., appeal from a decree which dissolved their marriage. The decree is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence and neither erroneously declares or applies the law. A written opinion would have no precedential value. The trial court’s decree is, therefore, affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). We have provided the parties with a memorandum, solely for their own use, explaining the reasons for our decision.

Lauer v. Lauer, 833 S.W.2d 893, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1363, 1992 WL 195496 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

833 S.W.2d 893 (Lauer v. Lauer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.