Laudramation Corp. v. Uniforms for Industry, Inc.

276 So. 2d 535, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6965
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 24, 1973
DocketNo. 72-1465
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 276 So. 2d 535 (Laudramation Corp. v. Uniforms for Industry, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laudramation Corp. v. Uniforms for Industry, Inc., 276 So. 2d 535, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6965 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order. The Supreme Court of Florida has held: “Our rules as currently amended do not permit motions for rehearing directed to interlocutory orders. . . . ” Wagner v. Bieley, Wagner & Associates, Inc., Fla. 1972, 263 So.2d 1, 4. Therefore, as the Wagner case held that an improperly filed petition for rehearing does not operate to toll the time for filing an interlocutory appeal, and the instant appeal was filed 36 days after the rendition of the trial court’s emergency restraining order, we find that we have no jurisdiction and the appeal must be dismissed.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tedesco v. Scott
308 So. 2d 54 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Griffin v. Florida Citrus Commission
42 Fla. Supp. 4 (Lake County Circuit Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
276 So. 2d 535, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laudramation-corp-v-uniforms-for-industry-inc-fladistctapp-1973.