Lauderdale v. Papadopoulos

460 F. App'x 361
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 9, 2012·No. 06-20879·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by that court. As was explained, this court held in Dvorak v. Carlson, 986 F.2d 940 (5th Cir.1993), that attorney fees owed to the guardian/attorney ad litem of a child are not dischargeable. The court repeated *362 that holding in Hudson v. Raggio, 107 F.3d 355 (5th Cir.1997). The decision of the Tenth Circuit in Lowther v. Lowther, 321 F.3d 946 (10th Cir.2002), is not favorable to the appellant here, because that court found unique circumstances for the one case and rejected the view that an exception should be allowed for a custodial parent.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lauderdale v. Papadopoulos, 460 F. App'x 361 (5th Cir. 2012).

460 F. App'x 361 (Lauderdale v. Papadopoulos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wischmeyer v. Bobinski
550 B.R. 417 (N.D. Indiana, 2015)