Lauderdale v. Papadopoulos

460 F. App'x 361
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 9, 2012
Docket06-20879
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 460 F. App'x 361 (Lauderdale v. Papadopoulos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lauderdale v. Papadopoulos, 460 F. App'x 361 (5th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by that court. As was explained, this court held in Dvorak v. Carlson, 986 F.2d 940 (5th Cir.1993), that attorney fees owed to the guardian/attorney ad litem of a child are not dischargeable. The court repeated *362 that holding in Hudson v. Raggio, 107 F.3d 355 (5th Cir.1997). The decision of the Tenth Circuit in Lowther v. Lowther, 321 F.3d 946 (10th Cir.2002), is not favorable to the appellant here, because that court found unique circumstances for the one case and rejected the view that an exception should be allowed for a custodial parent.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wischmeyer v. Bobinski
550 B.R. 417 (N.D. Indiana, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
460 F. App'x 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lauderdale-v-papadopoulos-ca5-2012.