Lauderdale Components, Inc. v. C-Thru Products, Inc.

558 So. 2d 442, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 996, 1990 WL 14257
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 21, 1990·No. No. 89-0289·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in part and reverse in part. We reject appellant’s claim that the evidence was insufficient to sustain an award for lost profits. However, we agree that the evidence was insufficient to sustain an award of punitive damages.

Accordingly, we affirm the award of compensatory damages but remand with directions that the award of punitive damages be stricken.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lauderdale Components, Inc. v. C-Thru Products, Inc., 558 So. 2d 442, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 996, 1990 WL 14257 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

558 So. 2d 442 (Lauderdale Components, Inc. v. C-Thru Products, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lakes of Emerald Hills v. Silverman
558 So. 2d 442 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)