Lauderdale By-The-Sea Development Company v. Humiston

Supreme Court of Florida

Lauderdale By-The-Sea Development Company v. Humiston

10 So. 2d 486, 151 Fla. 856, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1277

DecidedNovember 17, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 10 So. 2d 486 (Lauderdale By-The-Sea Development Company v. Humiston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lauderdale By-The-Sea Development Company v. Humiston, 10 So. 2d 486, 151 Fla. 856, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1277 (Fla. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This case grows out of a mill run real estate transaction wherein appellants sold appellees lots one, two and three, Blocks Nine of Lauderdale by the Sea, a subdivision in Broward County. It was instituted as a suit for injunction but wound up as one to require performance of the contract to sell. The ultimate questions turned on the interpretation of the evidence in support of a complicated set of facts. The chancellor found for the complainants and his finding finds ample support in the record. A detailed discussion of the questions raised would require a lengthy opinion that would serve no useful purpose.

The judgment appealed from was fair and equitable and is affirmed.

Affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This case grows out of a mill run real estate transaction wherein appellants sold appellees lots one, two and three, Blocks Nine of Lauderdale by the Sea, a subdivision in Broward County. It was instituted as a suit for injunction but wound up as one to require performance of the contract to sell. The ultimate questions turned on the interpretation of the evidence in support of a complicated set of facts. The chancellor found for the complainants and his finding finds ample support in the record. A detailed discussion of the questions raised would require a lengthy opinion that would serve no useful purpose.

The judgment appealed from was fair and equitable and is affirmed.

Affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 So. 2d 486, 151 Fla. 856, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lauderdale-by-the-sea-development-company-v-humiston-fla-1942.