Lauderdale Analytics, Inc. v. Wharton Management Group, Inc.
This text of 277 A.D.2d 16 (Lauderdale Analytics, Inc. v. Wharton Management Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), entered December 9, 1999, which granted petitioners’ application for a permanent stay of arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
On September 28, 1999, respondents-appellants Wharton Management Group, Inc. and Wharton Advisors, Inc. served a demand for arbitration of the various obligations of the parties with respect to a claim for indemnification of legal fees purportedly expended by Wharton Management on behalf of an entity known as Constellation Convertibles, Ltd. The demand alluded to three different agreements involving various partnerships, which partnerships in turn involved one or another of the various parties herein. Upon review of the relevant agreements, we fail to discern any unequivocal agreement to arbitrate the indemnification issues arising out of Wharton Management’s claim against a third party. In the absence of such an agreement, we cannot conclude that the parties agreed to arbitrate the issues that are the subject of the demand (see, Matter of Stigwood Org. [Atlantic Recording Corp.], 83 AD2d 123, 126). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Lerner, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 A.D.2d 16, 716 N.Y.S.2d 852, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lauderdale-analytics-inc-v-wharton-management-group-inc-nyappdiv-2000.