Lauder v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
This text of 93 P.2d 183 (Lauder v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
JACK LAUDER, Petitioner,
v.
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent.
California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate District, Division One.
Orloff & Katz and Abraham Corenfeld for Petitioner.
Memorandum
The Court.
We have this day filed a memorandum in the case of Rex, Inc., v. Superior Court, Civil No. 12389 (ante, p. 96 [93 PaCal.2d 182].) For the reasons therein given the petition for a writ of prohibition is denied.
York, P. J., being absent, did not participate herein.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 P.2d 183, 34 Cal. App. 2d 730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lauder-v-superior-court-of-los-angeles-county-calctapp-1939.