Lauder v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

93 P.2d 183, 34 Cal. App. 2d 730
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedAugust 11, 1939
DocketCiv. No. 12393
StatusPublished

This text of 93 P.2d 183 (Lauder v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lauder v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 93 P.2d 183, 34 Cal. App. 2d 730 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

34 Cal.App.2d 730 (1939)

JACK LAUDER, Petitioner,
v.
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent.

Civ. No. 12393.

California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate District, Division One.

August 11, 1939.

Orloff & Katz and Abraham Corenfeld for Petitioner.

Memorandum

The Court.

We have this day filed a memorandum in the case of Rex, Inc., v. Superior Court, Civil No. 12389 (ante, p. 96 [93 PaCal.2d 182].) For the reasons therein given the petition for a writ of prohibition is denied.

York, P. J., being absent, did not participate herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 P.2d 183, 34 Cal. App. 2d 730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lauder-v-superior-court-of-los-angeles-county-calctapp-1939.