Laucks v. Michael
This text of 26 A. 314 (Laucks v. Michael) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As the auditor and court below awarded to the appellant the whole of the fund left after paying the judgment of Haak, the only question remaining for practical consideration was, whether Haak’s judgment was to be considered as paid because of the renewal of the note, against liability on which the judgment was given as security. On that question-we agree entirely with the learned court below, and affirm the final decree for the reasons stated in the opinion.
Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A. 314, 154 Pa. 355, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laucks-v-michael-pa-1893.