Lauchman, Pt Vs. Dist. Ct. (Tarlton)

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided October 22, 2021·No. 82866·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JENELLE LAUCHMAN, PT, AN No. 82866 INDIVIDUAL; AND SELECT PHYSICAL THERAPY, D/B/A SELECT PHYSICAL THERAPY HOLDINGS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, Petitioners,

vs.

FR.

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OCT 2 2 2021 COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, A. BROWN UPREME COU

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

DEP CLERK

CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE TARA D. CLARK NEWBERRY, DISTRICT JUDGE,

Respondents,

and

MICHAEL D. TARLTON, AN INDIVIDUAL,

Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

Petitioners notice of withdrawal of this petition for a writ of mandamus is treated as a motion to voluntary dismiss this petition and granted. This petition is dismissed. NRAP 42(b).

It is so ORDERED.

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. B OWN

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

CLERK'S ORDER

t -4 šoÇc 7-

cc: Hon. Tara D. Clark Newberry, District Judge Alverson Taylor & Sanders H&P Law, PLLC Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COUITI- OF NEVADA

CLERK'S ORDER

(fl1q47 42pr, 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lauchman, Pt Vs. Dist. Ct. (Tarlton), (Neb. 2021).

Lauchman, Pt Vs. Dist. Ct. (Tarlton) (Lauchman, Pt Vs. Dist. Ct. (Tarlton)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.