Laube v. Rea

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedSeptember 16, 2013
Docket13-1048
StatusUnpublished

This text of Laube v. Rea (Laube v. Rea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laube v. Rea, (Fed. Cir. 2013).

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

KIM LAUBE, Appellant,

v.

TERESA STANEK REA, Acting Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Appellee,

AND

WAHL CLIPPER CORPORATION, Appellee. ______________________

2013-1048 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination No. 95/000,523. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

KENT A. ROWALD, Law Offices of Kent A. Rowald, PC, of Houston Texas, argued for appellant. MARY L. KELLY, Associate Solicitor, United States Pa- tent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee, Teresa Stanek Rea, Acting Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office. With her on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, ROBERT J. MCMANUS and AMY J. NELSON, Associate Solicitors.

MARK A. HAGEDORN, Barnes & Thornburg, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for appellee Wahl Clipper Corpo- ration. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, CLEVENGER, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 16, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Laube v. Rea, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laube-v-rea-cafc-2013.