Laubach v. Nehrling

Supreme Court of Florida

Laubach v. Nehrling

157 So. 925, 117 Fla. 169, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1220

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 3, 1934·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Laubach v. Nehrling, 157 So. 925, 117 Fla. 169, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1220 (Fla. 1934).

Pincite

157 So. 925 (Laubach v. Nehrling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.