Lau v. State of Hawaii

56 F.3d 71, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19891, 1995 WL 306821
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 18, 1995
Docket94-15395
StatusPublished

This text of 56 F.3d 71 (Lau v. State of Hawaii) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lau v. State of Hawaii, 56 F.3d 71, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19891, 1995 WL 306821 (9th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

56 F.3d 71
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Leionaona B. LAU; Francis L. Brown, and the surviving
children of William C. Brown (deceased), heirs of
Mrs. Valentina K. Brown; James H. Brown,
United States, ex rel,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
STATE OF HAWAI'I, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-15395.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 2, 1995.*
Decided May 18, 1995.

Before: PREGERSON, KOZINSKI and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Plaintiffs sued the state of Hawaii seeking compensatory and punitive damages for an allegedly illegal property tax assessment. Plaintiffs do not name any defendant but the state, and the state has not consented to suit. Plaintiffs' claims are therefore barred by the Eleventh Amendment. Price v. State of Hawaii, 921 F.2d 950, 958 (9th Cir. 1990).

Plaintiffs' complaint might also be construed as an attempt to appeal from adverse rulings in state court. Neither the district court nor this court has jurisdiction to hear any such appeal. Worldwide Church of God v. McNair, 805 F.2d 888, 890-91 (9th Cir. 1986).

Appellant's arguments, both in the district court and on appeal, are wholly without merit. See Wilcox v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 848 F.2d 1007, 1009 (9th Cir. 1988). The state's request that we award attorney's fees as a sanction for filing a frivolous appeal is therefore granted. We remand to the district court to determine the amount of the attorney's fee to be awarded.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robert P. Wilcox v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
848 F.2d 1007 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
Price v. State Of Hawaii
921 F.2d 950 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)
Worldwide Church of God v. McNair
805 F.2d 888 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 F.3d 71, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19891, 1995 WL 306821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lau-v-state-of-hawaii-ca9-1995.