Latzko v. Spector
238 N.E.2d 924, 22 N.Y.2d 710, 291 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1345
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs and without prejudice to a new action at law for damages pleading a relationship between the purported fraud and money loss to plaintiff. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Latzko v. Spector, 238 N.E.2d 924, 22 N.Y.2d 710, 291 N.Y.S.2d 818, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1345 (N.Y. 1968).
238 N.E.2d 924 (Latzko v. Spector) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cumberland Oil Corporation and Sugargrove, Ltd. v. James Thropp, Gregory Thropp, Arrowhead Gas Producers, Inc., and Southern Tier, Ltd.
791 F.2d 1037 (Second Circuit, 1986)
Waldman v. New Phone Dimensions, Inc.
109 A.D.2d 702 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Raymond Corp. v. Coopers & Lybrand
105 A.D.2d 926 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Peri v. State
66 A.D.2d 949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)