Latzke v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Latzke v. Williams

246 A.D. 714

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D. 714 (Latzke v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Latzke v. Williams, 246 A.D. 714 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to rescind a contract for the sale of certain real estate by plaintiffs to the defendant Washington Green, Inc. Order, so far as appealed from, denying motions of defendants-appellants for an order requiring that the 'complaint be made more definite and certain, or that certain allegations be stricken out as irrelevant, etc., that the causes of action be separately stated and numbered, or, in the alternative, to dismiss the complaint as insufficient and for other relief, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondents, with leave to said defendants to answer within twenty days after service of order upon payment of said costs. No opinion. Present —• McAvoy, Merrell, O’Malley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to rescind a contract for the sale of certain real estate by plaintiffs to the defendant Washington Green, Inc. Order, so far as appealed from, denying motions of defendants-appellants for an order requiring that the 'complaint be made more definite and certain, or that certain allegations be stricken out as irrelevant, etc., that the causes of action be separately stated and numbered, or, in the alternative, to dismiss the complaint as insufficient and for other relief, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondents, with leave to said defendants to answer within twenty days after service of order upon payment of said costs. No opinion. Present —• McAvoy, Merrell, O’Malley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D. 714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/latzke-v-williams-nyappdiv-1935.