Lature Robert Irvin v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 12, 2015·No. 01-15-00139-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-15-00139-CR Style: Lature Robert Irvin v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: July 28, 2015 Type of motion: Motion for Substitution of Counsel Party filing motion: Appellant’s new counsel Robert L. Sirianni, Jr. of Brownstone, P.A. Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No.

Ordered that motion is:  Granted  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ The motion to substitute counsel is granted, but construed as a notice of appearance of lead counsel and the Clerk of this Court is directed to note Robert L. Sirianni, Jr. of Brownstone, P.A.’s appearance as lead counsel for appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.1(a), 6.2, 6.5(d). If counsel Kurt B. Wentz requests withdrawal, he must file a motion that complies with Rule 6.5(d).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley 

Date: August 11, 2015

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lature Robert Irvin v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Lature Robert Irvin v. State (Lature Robert Irvin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.