Lattimore v. State
108 S.E. 245, 27 Ga. App. 319, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 865
This text of 108 S.E. 245 (Lattimore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lattimore v. State, 108 S.E. 245, 27 Ga. App. 319, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 865 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).
Opinion
1. When considered in connection with the entire charge, there is no error in the excerpt therefrom of which complaint is made in the amendment to the motion for a new trial. 2. There was ample evidence to authorize the verdict; the presiding judge approved it, and properly overruled the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
108 S.E. 245, 27 Ga. App. 319, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lattimore-v-state-gactapp-1921.