Lattimore v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.

141 S.E. 669, 37 Ga. App. 688, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 568
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lattimore v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 Ga. App. 250
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 9, 1928·No. 17103·Published

Opinion

Broyles, 0. J.

1. Under the decision of the Supreme Court in this case, on certiorari from this court (165 Ga. 501, 141 S. E. 195), the industrial commission had authority to reopen the case and to review and revise its award first made therein. It follows that the judgment of this court, rendered on April 14, 1926 (35 Ga. App. 250), reversing the judgment of the trial court, was error; and that judgment is hereby vacated.

2. Upon the reopening of the case and the hearing, to determine the question of the claimant’s dependency, the finding of the commissioner that she [689] was only partially dependent on the deceased employee (her son) was authorized by some of the evidence adduced. .That finding was approved by the full commission.

Decided February 9, 1928. E. W. Edwards, Taylor & Spurlin, for plaintiff. Wilson, Bennett & Pedriclc, for defendant.

3. Under the above-stated rulings, the trial court did not err in sustaining the award of the commission.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lattimore v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co., 141 S.E. 669, 37 Ga. App. 688, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 568 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

141 S.E. 669 (Lattimore v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Lattimore
141 S.E. 195 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)
Lattimore v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
133 S.E. 291 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)