Lattimer v. Dore
This text of 10 Ill. App. 563 (Lattimer v. Dore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In each of the foregoing cases, suit was brought by a creditor against a stockholder of an insurance company organized under the laws of this State, to enforce the individual liability imposed by the sixteenth section of the act in relation to fire insurance companies, approved March 11, 1869. The declarations were all substantially identical with those in Gulliver, v. Roelle, 100 Ill. 141, and Weidinger v. Spruance, 101 Id. 278; and in each case a demurrer to the declaration was sustained, and final judgment rendered thereon in favor of the defendant for costs. In pursuance of the decisions of the Supreme Court in the two cases above cited, the judgment in these cases will be reversed and the causes' remanded, with directions to the court below to overrule said demurrers, and for other proceedings.
Judgments reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Ill. App. 563, 1882 Ill. App. LEXIS 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lattimer-v-dore-illappct-1882.