Latt v. Schwehm

168 A. 660, 111 N.J.L. 493, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 388

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case will be affirmed. Judge Sooy properly inquired as to whether the parties to the agreement of sale had, in fact, subsequent to the execution thereof, modified it to the extent of releasing the vendee from his covenant of assumption of the mortgage covering the lands. Dieckman v. Walser, 114 N. J. Eq. 382, decided at the current (May, 1933) term of this court. The evidence supports the finding ■of the trial judge.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Ciiiee Justice, Teenghaed, Paekee, Case, Bodine, Hehee, Peeskie, Van BusicieKj Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — Hone.