Latronica v. . Southern Boulevard Railroad Company
123 N.E. 875, 226 N.Y. 604, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 961
This text of 123 N.E. 875 (Latronica v. . Southern Boulevard Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Latronica v. . Southern Boulevard Railroad Company, 123 N.E. 875, 226 N.Y. 604, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 961 (N.Y. 1919).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Carbozo, Pound and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting: Chase and McLaughlin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
123 N.E. 875, 226 N.Y. 604, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/latronica-v-southern-boulevard-railroad-company-ny-1919.