Latron D. Williams v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 1, 2010
Docket04-10-00538-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Latron D. Williams v. State (Latron D. Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Latron D. Williams v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00538-CR

Latron D. WILLIAMS, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-CR-4409 Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 1, 2010

DISMISSED

Appellant Latron D. Williams pleaded guilty to the offense of murder pursuant to a plea

bargain agreement. As part of his plea bargain, appellant signed a separate “Waiver of Appeal.” The

trial court imposed sentence and signed a certificate stating that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the

defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant timely filed a notice

of appeal. The clerk’s record, which includes the plea bargain agreement and the trial court’s Rule 04-10-00538-CR

25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2(d). This court must dismiss an

appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of

the record.” Id.

The court gave appellant notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial

court certification showing he has the right to appeal were made part of the appellate record within

thirty days. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San

Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet.

ref’d) (not designated for publication). Appellant’s appointed appellate counsel filed a written

response, stating she has reviewed the record and can find no right of appeal. After reviewing the

record and counsel’s notice, we agree appellant does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State,

154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record

to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). We therefore dismiss this appeal. See

TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d).

Do Not Publish

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Latron D. Williams v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/latron-d-williams-v-state-texapp-2010.