Latoya Rhodes v. Park at LeBlanc

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 28, 2024
Docket13-24-00203-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Latoya Rhodes v. Park at LeBlanc (Latoya Rhodes v. Park at LeBlanc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Latoya Rhodes v. Park at LeBlanc, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-24-00203-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

LATOYA RHODES, Appellant,

v.

PARK AT LEBLANC, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Tijerina and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras

On March 11, 2024, appellant filed a notice of appeal in trial court cause number

2023-009380-1. 1 On April 30, 2024, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Second Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. notice of appeal did not comply with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5(e) and

25.1(d)(1), (2), (3), and (4). See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(e) and 25.1(d)(1), (2), (3), (4). On

June 21, 2024, the Clerk of the Court again notified appellant that her notice of appeal

was defective; appellant was further notified that if the defects were not cured within ten

days from the date of the notice the appeal would be dismissed. See id. R. 42.3. (b), (c).

Appellant has not cured the defective notice of appeal, nor otherwise responded

to the notices from the clerk requiring a response or other action within the time specified;

accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c).

DORI CONTRERAS Chief Justice

Delivered and filed on the 28th day of August, 2024.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Latoya Rhodes v. Park at LeBlanc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/latoya-rhodes-v-park-at-leblanc-texapp-2024.