Latoya Renee Ortiz v. State
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ March 10, 2021
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A21D0228. LATOYA RENEE ORTIZ v. THE STATE.
Latoya Renee Ortiz filed an “Out of Time Motion to Reduce/Modify Sentence.” The trial court denied her motion on September 1, 2020, and Ortiz filed this application for discretionary review on February 12, 2020. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
To be timely, a discretionary application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d); Hill v State, 204 Ga. App. 582, 583 (420 SE2d 393) (1992). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith. See Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Here, Ortiz filed her application 164 days after the trial court entered its order. Accordingly, the application is untimely, and it is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 03/10/2021
I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Latoya Renee Ortiz v. State (Latoya Renee Ortiz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.