Latosha L. Campbell v. Katherin Compton, et al.

Opinion

LATOSHA L. CAMPBELL, Case No.: 2:25-cv-01139-APG-MDC 4 Plaintiff Order v. [ECF No. 6] KATHERIN COMPTON, et al., 7 Defendants 8 On October 20, 2025, Magistrate Judge Couvillier recommended that I dismiss this case without prejudice because plaintiff Latosha Campbell did not comply with his order to either pay the filing fee or file a new application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 6. Campbell did object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and 12}|recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is 14! made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the 15}| district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 16}| objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Couvillier’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 6) is accepted, and plaintiff Latosha Campell’s complaint (ECF No. 1-1) is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 20 DATED this 5th day of November, 2025. 21 3 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE