Latorre v. Pepsi Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.
This text of 204 Misc. 184 (Latorre v. Pepsi Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A party securing a discovery and inspection is not required to furnish a copy of his own expert’s report to his adversary. (Glichenhouse v. Pepsi-Cola, N. Y. L. J., Aug. 6, 1942, p. 288, col. 1; Hanover v. Kelly Dry Ginger Ale, N. Y. L. J., Nov. 2, 1944, p. 1152, col. 2.)
The order should be unanimously modified upon the law by striking therefrom the provision requiring defendant to furnish a copy of the report of the discovery and inspection to plaintiff’s attorney and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. The inspection shall proceed on March 25, 1953, at 10:30 a.m., at the place fixed in the order or at such other time and place to which the parties may stipulate.
Walsh, Cuff and Ughetta, JJ., concur.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 Misc. 184, 125 N.Y.S.2d 329, 1953 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/latorre-v-pepsi-cola-metropolitan-bottling-co-nyappterm-1953.