Latoja v. Carnival Corp.

Eleventh Circuit

Latoja v. Carnival Corp.

144 F. App'x 101

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedSeptember 21, 2005

DocketNo. 04-11681; D.C. Docket No. 03-23195-CV-UUB

StatusPublished

This text of 144 F. App'x 101 (Latoja v. Carnival Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Latoja v. Carnival Corp., 144 F. App'x 101 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

As the appellant, Ruel D. Latoja, candidly concedes, his position in this appeal is squarely foreclosed by our decision earlier this year in Bautista v. Star Cruises, 396 F.3d 1289 (11th Cir.2005). There is no material distinction between the two cases. Latoja seeks only to preserve his ability to seek certiorari review in the United States Supreme Court, and he has done that.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

As the appellant, Ruel D. Latoja, candidly concedes, his position in this appeal is squarely foreclosed by our decision earlier this year in Bautista v. Star Cruises, 396 F.3d 1289 (11th Cir.2005). There is no material distinction between the two cases. Latoja seeks only to preserve his ability to seek certiorari review in the United States Supreme Court, and he has done that.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 F. App'x 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/latoja-v-carnival-corp-ca11-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack