Latoja v. Carnival Corp.
144 F. App'x 101
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided September 21, 2005·No. No. 04-11681; D.C. Docket No. 03-23195-CV-UUB·Published
Opinion
As the appellant, Ruel D. Latoja, candidly concedes, his position in this appeal is squarely foreclosed by our decision earlier this year in Bautista v. Star Cruises, 396 F.3d 1289 (11th Cir.2005). There is no material distinction between the two cases. Latoja seeks only to preserve his ability to seek certiorari review in the United States Supreme Court, and he has done that.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Latoja v. Carnival Corp., 144 F. App'x 101 (11th Cir. 2005).
144 F. App'x 101 (Latoja v. Carnival Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rizalyn Bautista v. Star Cruises
396 F.3d 1289 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)