Latimore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Latimore v. State

466 So. 2d 16, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 735, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13092

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 19, 1985

DocketNo. 84-1220

StatusPublished

This text of 466 So. 2d 16 (Latimore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Latimore v. State, 466 So. 2d 16, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 735, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13092 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have now received the State’s response to our order to show cause issued following the defendant’s motion to compel compliance with our mandate of July 6, 1984. The pages of the trial record which are attached to the State’s response should have been attached initially to the trial court’s order denying the defendant’s Rule 3.850 motion. After much unnecessary delay and waste of labor, judicial and otherwise, we are compelled to find that the pages of the trial record show that the trial court was correct in denying the defendant’s Rule 3.850 motion. Accordingly, that order of January 28, 1984, is belatedly

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have now received the State’s response to our order to show cause issued following the defendant’s motion to compel compliance with our mandate of July 6, 1984. The pages of the trial record which are attached to the State’s response should have been attached initially to the trial court’s order denying the defendant’s Rule 3.850 motion. After much unnecessary delay and waste of labor, judicial and otherwise, we are compelled to find that the pages of the trial record show that the trial court was correct in denying the defendant’s Rule 3.850 motion. Accordingly, that order of January 28, 1984, is belatedly

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

466 So. 2d 16, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 735, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/latimore-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.