Latimer v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Latimer v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.

88 S.W. 444, 40 Tex. Civ. App. 136, 1905 Tex. App. LEXIS 89

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 17, 1905

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 88 S.W. 444 (Latimer v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Latimer v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co., 88 S.W. 444, 40 Tex. Civ. App. 136, 1905 Tex. App. LEXIS 89 (Tex. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

RAINEY, Chief Justice.

On a former day of this term we sustained a motion to dismiss the writ of error without written opinion, because the affidavit in lieu of a writ of error bond was made before a notary public in the State of Arkansas. This holding was based on the case of Jenks v. Jenks, 47 Texas, 220.

Hpon considering a motion for a rehearing we have concluded that our former holding was error. The case of Jenks v. Jenks, though *137 correct under the law then existing (1877), should not be followed, because since then the law has been changed and now authorizes the making of affidavits before a notary public in another State. (Rev. Stats., art. 7, subdiv. 2.)

The motion for rehearing is granted and the motion to dismiss is overruled.

Application for writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI