Latimer v. Dent

172 So. 126, 177 Miss. 869, 1937 Miss. LEXIS 156
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 18, 1937
DocketNo. 32510.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 172 So. 126 (Latimer v. Dent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Latimer v. Dent, 172 So. 126, 177 Miss. 869, 1937 Miss. LEXIS 156 (Mich. 1937).

Opinion

Griffith, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a personal injury suit in which the jury returned a verdict for the defendant. The latter requested and obtained the following instruction: “The court charges the jury for the defendant that if you believe from the evidence that plaintiff was furnished with a safe place to work, and was injured as a result of placing himself in a dangerous place not called for by his duties, in order to assist a fellow employe then plaintiff cannot recover and you must find for the defendant. ’ ’ This instruction is a correct announcement of the law as seen from McKinnon v. Braddock, 139 Miss. 424, 104 *873 So. 154, and Hinton Bros. Lumber Co. v. Polk, 117 Miss. 300, 78 So. 179.

There is substantial testimony in the record in support of the instruction; and after a careful examination of transcript, we cannot properly say that this testimony is contrary to the overwhelming weight of the whole evidence. We are, therefore, not authorized to interfere with the verdict and judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pearson v. Weaver
173 So. 2d 666 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 So. 126, 177 Miss. 869, 1937 Miss. LEXIS 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/latimer-v-dent-miss-1937.