Lathuras v. Levittown Public Schools

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lathuras v. Levittown Public Schools

300 A.D.2d 364, 751 N.Y.S.2d 856

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 300 A.D.2d 364 (Lathuras v. Levittown Public Schools) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lathuras v. Levittown Public Schools, 300 A.D.2d 364, 751 N.Y.S.2d 856 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Martin, J.), dated October 30, 2001, which, inter alia, after a nonjury trial, and upon granting the defendant’s motion to amend the court’s decision dated July 28, 2000, is in favor of the defendant and against them dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiffs lacked standing as to their contention that the defendant breached the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Aenas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, 332).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Feuerstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Martin, J.), dated October 30, 2001, which, inter alia, after a nonjury trial, and upon granting the defendant’s motion to amend the court’s decision dated July 28, 2000, is in favor of the defendant and against them dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiffs lacked standing as to their contention that the defendant breached the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Aenas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, 332).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Feuerstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

300 A.D.2d 364, 751 N.Y.S.2d 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lathuras-v-levittown-public-schools-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack