Lathrop v. Allen

19 Johns. 229
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1821
StatusPublished

This text of 19 Johns. 229 (Lathrop v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lathrop v. Allen, 19 Johns. 229 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1821).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Without going into a particular consideration all the points made on the argument of this cause, it is suffisnt for its determination to advert to one of them only, which decisive against the plaintiff in error. If we take into view e whole of the declaration and the breaches assigned, it is event that the plaintiff has, by the inquisition, recovered damais to which he is not entitled, either against the collector or his reties, namely, the fees of collection given by the statute to e collector. It is to be intended that the damages have been sessed on the breaches as assigned. We are, therefore, of opion that th,e judgment of the Court below ought to be affirmed,

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Johns. 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lathrop-v-allen-nysupct-1821.