Lathim v. Schlack

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Lathim v. Schlack

1911 OK 97, 114 P. 608, 28 Okla. 471, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 130

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lathim v. Schlack. Read the opinion of the Court — 27 Okla. 522 →

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided March 21, 1911·No. 1669·Published

Opinion

KANE, J.

This cansé comes on to be heard upon a motion to strike the case-made from the files and to dismiss the appeal, upon the ground that no briefs have 'been filed by the plaintiff in error within 40 days of the filing of the petition in error, as required hy rule of the Supreme Court. The record shows that the petition in error was filed on the 9th day of May, 1910, and up to this date no briefs have been filed, and no showing made by plaintiff in error why they have not been filed, nor any extension of time asked within which to file the same.

The motion to dismiss ought to be sustained. It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KANE, J.

This cansé comes on to be heard upon a motion to strike the case-made from the files and to dismiss the appeal, upon the ground that no briefs have 'been filed by the plaintiff in error within 40 days of the filing of the petition in error, as required hy rule of the Supreme Court. The record shows that the petition in error was filed on the 9th day of May, 1910, and up to this date no briefs have been filed, and no showing made by plaintiff in error why they have not been filed, nor any extension of time asked within which to file the same.

The motion to dismiss ought to be sustained. It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Lathim v. Schlack, 1911 OK 97, 114 P. 608, 28 Okla. 471, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 130 (Okla. 1911).

Pincite

1911 OK 97 (Lathim v. Schlack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.