Latham v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Latham v. State

91 S.W.2d 350

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 12, 1936

DocketNo. 17921

StatusPublished

This text of 91 S.W.2d 350 (Latham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Latham v. State, 91 S.W.2d 350 (Tex. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of simple assault, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $20.

The objections to the court’s charge cannot be properly appraised, in view of the fact that there is no statement of facts and no bills of exception. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of simple assault, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $20.

The objections to the court’s charge cannot be properly appraised, in view of the fact that there is no statement of facts and no bills of exception. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 S.W.2d 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/latham-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.