Latham v. State

161 S.E. 168, 44 Ga. App. 271, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 665
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 11, 1931
Docket21683
StatusPublished

This text of 161 S.E. 168 (Latham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Latham v. State, 161 S.E. 168, 44 Ga. App. 271, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 665 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence amply authorized the verdict, and the special grounds of the motion for a new trial fail to disclose reversible error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodicorth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 S.E. 168, 44 Ga. App. 271, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/latham-v-state-gactapp-1931.