Latham v. Lawson

526 So. 2d 744, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2190, 1988 WL 54215
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 1988·No. No. 87-2932·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Mercer v. Raine, 443 So.2d 944 (Fla.1983); HZJ, Inc. v. Wysocki, 511 So.2d 1088 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Watson v. Peskoe, 407 So.2d 954 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Freeman v. Humana, Inc., 501 So.2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), rev. denied, 511 So.2d 298 (Fla.1987).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Latham v. Lawson, 526 So. 2d 744, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2190, 1988 WL 54215 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

526 So. 2d 744 (Latham v. Lawson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lawson v. Latham
564 So. 2d 1216 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)